Xbox 360 vs. PS3

[Redhollowlives999]

The technology drastically improved and the industry moved on to the next generations

The industry have dumbed down "Drastically"

I assume you mean system or console

The answer: there's no such thing. It's just your taste in games

All these newer systems suck.

Whatever you want to mane

The world deserves to die in the sun's core.

[Zup]

I wish the 360 controllers had better d-pads \ Kinda affects fighing games (too broke to afford a fightstick)

[Lonewulf]

Yeah, the 360 d-pad sucks. Always found the 360 controller to be kinda awkward but not too bad. PS1/2/3 controllers are the best, imo.

[Redhollowlives999]

PS3 because I have one and I say so.

This is enough of a reason to end this meaningless thread


Honestly, again, both are crap.


And now a PS4? >___> GTHO

[Prayrius]

Okay, I'm happy to see so many ps3 fans. I just wanted to point something out about the kinect that no one seems to have noticed. It is exactly the same as the ps2 eyetoy. You may say it is cutting edge technolgy but Sony got to that cutting tech first. Sadly for reasons unknown it never got popular. How do I know the eyetoy for the ps2 is as good as the kinect? I have one.

[K73SK]

Actually the eyetoy is not a 3D camera. They considered making a 3D eyetoy for the PS3 but it got cancelled. And it doesn't allow for a 3D model on a game to be manipulated to match the player - it only allows for 2D objects to show on the screen for the player to interact with. Unless it was a 3D camera, it wouldn't be able to do the 3D modeling anyway.

[Prayrius]

Oh, so what is the difference between 2d and 3d?

[K73SK]

3D cameras read the distance between points in the environment. So it can calculate your distance from it, the distance to the wall behind you, a ball in front of you, whatever is inside the camera. A 2D camera only draws what it sees - no measuring is done whatsoever. One can turn you into a 3D model and one can't (get it?).

[Prayrius]

now i do.